Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than Honor 50's global score of 74.5. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Galaxy F62 body is thicker and heavier than the Honor 50. Honor 50 features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy F62 features a slightly better screen than Honor 50, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little bigger display and a little bit better pixel density. Honor 50 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy F62, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Honor 50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery life than Honor 50, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.