Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Honor 50, getting a score of 97.6 against 74.5. Galaxy Fold is an older and extremely heavier cellphone than Honor 50, but Samsung could make it a little thinner anyway. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Honor 50 has Android 11.
The Galaxy Fold features a little better performance than Honor 50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a display that is very similar to the screen in Honor 50, because although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly better 1536 x 2152 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Fold features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Honor 50, because it has more internal storage capacity. Honor 50 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images or video in poorly lited environments and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy Fold features a bit longer battery performance than Honor 50, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.