Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Honor 50, with a 90.8 score against 74.5. Even being the best in this review, the Galaxy Note 20 body is older, just a bit thicker and just a little heavier than Honor 50. Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Honor 50. They have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little sharper screen than Honor 50, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a just a bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a little bit larger display. The Honor 50 and the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 feature extremely similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a battery life that is very similar to the Honor 50 one. Honor 50 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Honor 50 also counts with better 30 frames per second video frame rate and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.