Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Honor 50's 74.5 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Honor 50 has Android 11 version, providing the user a lot of extra features. Despite being the best in our current comparison, we must tell that it is also an older, somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker phone.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better display than Honor 50, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a quite larger display and more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little faster processor than Honor 50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Honor 50, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and a way higher video definition. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Honor 50, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit longer battery performance than Honor 50, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.