Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than Honor 50, getting a score of 80.4 against 74.5. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a incredibly older and just a bit thicker cellphone than Honor 50, but Samsung managed to make it just a bit lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit more vivid screen than Honor 50, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixel density.
Honor 50 features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor 50 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Honor 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The Honor 50 has a greater camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Honor 50 also counts with a camera with lot more MP.
Honor 50 counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 34 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.