Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a general score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than Honor 50's 74.5 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 design is a little bit lighter than the Honor 50, but it's just a little thicker and was released 5 years before. The Honor 50 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4 more cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit better looking screen than Honor 50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher display pixel density. Honor 50 takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Honor 50 also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Honor 50, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 256 GB. Honor 50 features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4300mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.