Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is better than Honor 50, having a score of 88.3 against 74.5. These devices include the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy S10 is a incredibly older and a little thicker phone than the Honor 50, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat lighter anyway. Galaxy S10 features a sharper display than Honor 50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040.
The Galaxy S10 features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor 50, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S10 has a little better processing power than Honor 50. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Honor 50 captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos in poorly lited situations and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 also counts with a much more MP camera.
Honor 50 features greater battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.