Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is much better than the Honor 50, getting a score of 86.3 against 74.5. The Samsung Galaxy S10e body is somewhat lighter than the Honor 50, although it is just a bit thicker and was released 2 years before. The Galaxy S10e features a bit sharper display than Honor 50, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2280px resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater screen pixels density.
Galaxy S10e features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Honor 50, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S10e counts with a little faster processor than Honor 50, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Honor 50 counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. The Honor 50 takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and/or video in low light environments and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.