Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Honor 50, having a 90.8 score against 74.5. Although it's the best phone we are comparing, it must be told that it's also just a little heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better looking screen than Honor 50, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixel quantity per inch of screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy S20 FE features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor 50, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Honor 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit better battery duration than Honor 50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Honor 50 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Honor 50 also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.