Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is way better than Honor 50's 74.5 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is older, thicker and notably heavier than Honor 50. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while Honor 50 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Honor 50, because it has a greater pixel density, a little bit larger screen and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Honor 50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better camera than Honor 50, and although they both have a back camera with a 108 MP resolution, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a much better video quality. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor 50, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features improved battery performance than Honor 50, because it has a 16% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.