Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than Honor 50, getting a 93.4 score against 74.5. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a a bit lighter phone than Honor 50, but both have the same thickness. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version and Honor 50 has Android 11.
Galaxy S22's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Honor 50, they have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much better display than Honor 50, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a little bit better pixels count per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy S22 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Honor 50, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photos in low light environments and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality. The Honor 50 and the Galaxy S22 both have quite similar memory capacity for apps and games, both have the same internal storage capacity.
The Honor 50 features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4300mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.