Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is a lot better than Honor 50's global score of 74.5. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Honor 50 has Android 11 version. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is extremely heavier and thicker than Honor 50.
Honor 50 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much sharper display than Honor 50, because it has a greater number of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit bigger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than Honor 50, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 108 mega-pixels, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture. The Honor 50 and the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra have very similar memory to install games and applications, they have the same internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has greater battery duration than Honor 50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.