Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Honor 50, getting an 81 score against 74.5. Both devices in this review work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. Galaxy XCover Pro is a better phone than Honor 50, we must tell that it's also older, notably heavier and incredibly thicker.
The Honor 50 has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 also has more RAM. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better display than Honor 50, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a little bit higher screen pixel density.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Honor 50, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Honor 50 has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery capacity.
Honor 50 captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.