Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is way better than Honor 50's 74.5 score. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and extremely heavier than Honor 50, it's design is still a little thinner.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit sharper screen than Honor 50, because although it has a little bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a larger display. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Honor 50, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better performance than Honor 50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. The Honor 50 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Honor 50, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.