Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Honor 50, getting a general score of 90.6 against 74.5. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 operating system. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Honor 50 were released with only 2 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is somewhat thinner but notably heavier than Honor 50.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better performance than Honor 50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a display that's very similar to the display in Honor 50, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and a higher 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Honor 50, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Honor 50 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back facing camera with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a bit better battery life than Honor 50, because it has a 4400mAh battery size instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.