Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a score of 82.9, which is much better than Honor 50's overall score of 74.5. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Honor 50 has Android 11. Even being the best phone in this comparison, Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's body is older, somewhat heavier and thicker than the Honor 50.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Honor 50. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Honor 50, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features as much memory capacity for apps and games as the Honor 50, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Honor 50 counts with a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 4300mAh battery size. Honor 50 captures clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 also counts with a camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.