Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a general score of 76.6, which is slightly better than the Honor 50's general score of 74.5. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has 10 version while Honor 50 has Android 11 version. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 design is older, somewhat thicker and heavier than Honor 50.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 and Honor 50 both count with quite similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density. Honor 50 has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 also has more RAM.
Honor 50 has a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with longer battery duration than Honor 50, because it has a 17 percent larger battery size.
Honor 50 counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photos or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much more MP back camera and a way higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.