Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-10-25 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.94 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 655 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than Honor 6x, having a general score of 81.3 against 59.7. LG V35 ThinQ's body is newer, just a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the Honor 6x. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little better processing power than Honor 6x, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking screen than Honor 6x, because it has a greater display density, a little bit larger screen and a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Honor 6x, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ shoots a lot better photos and videos than Honor 6x, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a way bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low light environments.
The LG V35 ThinQ and Honor 6x both feature similar battery performance, although the LG V35 ThinQ has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than the Honor 6x, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.