Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.7 | 65.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-25 | 2020-09-23 |
| 5.94 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Charcoal, Dusk and Fjord |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 655 chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 7.81 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 2.4 is a bit better than Honor 6x, getting a general score of 65.6 against 59.7. Nokia 2.4's design is incredibly newer than Honor 6x's, although it is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. The Honor 6x counts with a better looking display than Nokia 2.4, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
Nokia 2.4 has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor 6x, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Nokia 2.4 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Honor 6x features a bit superior processor than Nokia 2.4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor 6x also has a higher amount of RAM.
Honor 6x counts with just a bit better camera than Nokia 2.4, although it has a lower 1920x1080 video quality and a lower resolution camera in the back, they both have a F2.2 diafragm aperture. Nokia 2.4 has greater battery lifetime than Honor 6x, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Nokia 2.4 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.