Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.7 | 65.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-10-25 | 2018-07-02 |
| 5.94 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.76 x 2.70 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 4.88 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 159.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 310 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.4 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 655 chipset | MediaTek MT6750 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Mali-T860 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 5.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 has a general score of 65.5, which is a little bit better than the Honor 6x's 59.7 general score. Although Nokia 3.1 is a bit thicker than Honor 6x, it's somewhat lighter and newer. The Honor 6x features a little more vivid screen than Nokia 3.1, because it has a better pixels density, a much higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a bit larger display.
The Honor 6x features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 3.1, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal storage capacity, the Honor 6x also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 128 GB. Honor 6x features a bit faster processor than Nokia 3.1. They have 3 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Nokia 3.1 captures better photographs and videos than Honor 6x, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Nokia 3.1 also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a better 13 mega pixels resolution camera.
Honor 6x counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Nokia 3.1, because it has a 12% more battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Nokia 3.1 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.