Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2017-12-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.16 x 2.96 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 659 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2360 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is way better than Honor 7X, getting an 80.7 score against 62.2. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is newer than Honor 7X's, but it is heavier and a little bit thicker. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better hardware performance than Honor 7X, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit sharper display than Honor 7X, because it has a higher number of pixels per inch of screen, a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a little bit bigger display. The Google Pixel 3 XL captures a little bit better photos and videos than Honor 7X, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and video, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Honor 7X counts with more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Google Pixel 3 XL features just a bit longer battery performance than Honor 7X, because it has a 3% greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.