Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2017-12-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.16 x 2.96 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 659 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2360 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than Honor 7X, with an 83.8 score against 62.2. The Galaxy A50 is a a bit heavier cellphone than Honor 7X, but both are 0.3inches thick. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a screen that's very similar to the Honor 7X one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Galaxy A50's processing unit is just as good as Honor 7X's CPU, and although the Galaxy A50 has 1 GB more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A50 has just a bit better camera than Honor 7X, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A50 also has a bigger camera sensor, a camera with a way better 25 mega pixels resolution and a way larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor 7X, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A50 has longer battery lifetime than Honor 7X, because it has a 20% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50 costs a little more than the Honor 7X, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.