Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2016-07-19 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.73 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 332.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 950 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is a lot better than the Honor 8's score of 65.7. Google Pixel 4's body is a lot newer, but a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than Honor 8. Google Pixel 4 features a bit superior processing unit than Honor 8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 has a little more vivid screen than Honor 8, because it has a quite bigger display, a just a little greater screen pixels density and a bit higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution. The Google Pixel 4 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Honor 8, because it has a bigger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality, a much larger aperture, a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with more megapixels.
Honor 8 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Honor 8 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB. Honor 8 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 4 costs a little more money than the Honor 8, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.