Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.7 | 72.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-19 | 2020-06-12 |
| 5.73 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.68 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and White | Pearl white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 332.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 950 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP4 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Fast has a global score of 72.2, which is just a bit better than the Honor 8's global score of 65.7. Moto G Fast's design is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than Honor 8. The Honor 8 features a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor 8 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Honor 8 has a sharper screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better number of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels. The Honor 8 features a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 384 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a little bit better camera than Honor 8, because it has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a much bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Moto G Fast has better battery life than Honor 8, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Moto G Fast is also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.