Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.7 | 71.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-07-19 | 2018-06-07 |
| 5.73 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 332.00 | $ 240.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 950 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP4 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.35 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy J7 V (2018) is a bit better than Honor 8, with a 71.9 score against 65.7. The Galaxy J7 V (2018) is a newer phone than Honor 8, but it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Honor 8 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater display pixels density and a lot better 1080 x 1920px resolution.
Honor 8 features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 8 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Honor 8 has a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 128 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory.
The Honor 8 features a bit better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), although it has a way smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, a back camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution and a worse 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution. Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with a bit better battery duration than Honor 8, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery size.
The Galaxy J7 V (2018) not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.