Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-19 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 332.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 950 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Honor 8, having a score of 93.6 against 65.7. The Galaxy S10 5G is a much newer phone than Honor 8, although it is incredibly heavier and a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better display than Honor 8, because it has a little bit greater screen density, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a larger screen.
Galaxy S10 5G has a much better storage for games and applications than Honor 8, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10 5G features just a little better processing power than Honor 8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than Honor 8, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Honor 8, and although they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back camera, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor, a way higher (4K) video quality and a much bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G costs a bit more money than Honor 8, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.