Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than Honor Magic 6 Pro, having an 83.8 score against 76.6. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a somewhat thinner and much lighter phone than the Honor Magic 6 Pro. The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A50, because it has a little bit better pixel density, a little bit larger screen and a higher resolution of 1280 x 2800 pixels.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A50, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a lot better (4K) video definition, a lot larger back camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and a camera with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.