Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is much better than Honor Magic 6 Pro, getting a global score of 85.5 against 76.6. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Honor Magic 6 Pro has Android 14 version. The Galaxy A51 design is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than the Honor Magic 6 Pro.
Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a quite bigger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1280 x 2800 pixels and a little better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a camera with more mega-pixels, a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality, a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations and faster video frame rate.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A51, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.