Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Honor Magic 6 Pro, having a global score of 98.9 against 76.6. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Honor Magic 6 Pro has Android 14. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Honor Magic 6 Pro.
Honor Magic 6 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra. They have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a slightly better looking display than Honor Magic 6 Pro, because it has a bit higher display pixel density, a bit higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little larger screen.
Honor Magic 6 Pro features more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Honor Magic 6 Pro, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and video in low light environments, it also counts with a larger sensor, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a back facing camera with a much better 108 MP resolution.
Honor Magic 6 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.