Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is better than the Honor Magic 6 Pro's overall score of 76.6. Galaxy S10e is a way lighter and thinner cellphone than Honor Magic 6 Pro. Honor Magic 6 Pro features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a higher resolution of 1280 x 2800px, a larger display and a quite higher pixel density.
Honor Magic 6 Pro has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. The Honor Magic 6 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited situations and a camera with a lot better resolution.
Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with much more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has an 81 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.