Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than Honor Magic 6 Pro, with a general score of 79.5 against 76.6. Samsung Galaxy S7's construction is much lighter and somewhat thinner than the Honor Magic 6 Pro. The Galaxy S7 has a much better looking display than Honor Magic 6 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a better hardware performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores. The Honor Magic 6 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels, a larger diafragm aperture for better photos in low light situations, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro features a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Honor Magic 6 Pro has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 5600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.