Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 has an overall score of 81.7, which is just a bit better than the Honor Magic 6 Pro's 76.6 overall score. The Galaxy S8 is a much lighter and thinner phone than the Honor Magic 6 Pro. The Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has more RAM.
Galaxy S8 counts with a bit better looking screen than Honor Magic 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a better display pixels density. Honor Magic 6 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S8, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a way better battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity. Honor Magic 6 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same video definition, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.