Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is just a bit better than the Honor Magic 6 Pro, with an 83.3 score against 76.6. The Samsung Galaxy S9 design is a little bit thinner and a lot lighter than the Honor Magic 6 Pro. Honor Magic 6 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S9 has a slightly better screen than Honor Magic 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels count per screen inch and a quite better 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Honor Magic 6 Pro captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited environments and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Honor Magic 6 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has an 87 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.