Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | -- |
| 453 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than the Honor Magic 6 Pro, with a global score of 80.1 against 76.6. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while Honor Magic 6 Pro has Android 14 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a heavier and thicker phone than Honor Magic 6 Pro.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little sharper screen than Honor Magic 6 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Honor Magic 6 Pro features a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Honor Magic 6 Pro has a bit faster processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has more RAM. Honor Magic 6 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels, a way higher video definition, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 24 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.