Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is better than the Honor Magic 6 Pro's 76.6 global score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's body is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than Honor Magic 6 Pro. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version and Honor Magic 6 Pro has Android 14.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a bit larger screen, a bit greater display pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1280 x 2800px. The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Honor Magic 6 Pro has a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5600mAh battery size. Honor Magic 6 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light environments and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.