Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than the Honor Magic6 Pro, with a overall score of 85.5 against 76.6. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Honor Magic6 Pro has Android 14. The Galaxy A51 is a much lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the Honor Magic6 Pro.
Honor Magic6 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A51, because it has a little higher pixels density, a bit higher 1280 x 2800 pixels resolution and a little bit larger screen. Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A51, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
The Honor Magic6 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Honor Magic6 Pro features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos, a much larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos, higher video frame rates and a higher resolution camera in the back.
The Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 40% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.