Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than Honor Magic6 Pro's general score of 76.6. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Honor Magic6 Pro. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Honor Magic6 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little more vivid screen than Honor Magic6 Pro, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a little bit bigger screen. The Honor Magic6 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Honor Magic6 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP, a way better video quality and a larger camera sensor shooting better quality photos.
Honor Magic6 Pro features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Honor Magic6 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.