Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is much better than the Honor Magic6 Pro's global score of 76.6. The Samsung Galaxy S22 construction is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than the Honor Magic6 Pro. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has older 13 version and Honor Magic6 Pro has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a brighter screen than Honor Magic6 Pro, although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Honor Magic6 Pro has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Honor Magic6 Pro features a bit better performance than Galaxy S22, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Honor Magic6 Pro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a worse image quality and a way tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Honor Magic6 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.