Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is way better than Honor Magic6 Pro's 76.6 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra design has the same weight and thickness than the Honor Magic6 Pro. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Honor Magic6 Pro has Android 14.
The Honor Magic6 Pro has a little bit better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better looking screen than Honor Magic6 Pro, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy S22 Ultra takes better videos and photos than Honor Magic6 Pro, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is worse for taking pictures in low-light environments, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos, a lot higher video definition and a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Honor Magic6 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Honor Magic6 Pro features a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 5600mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.