Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a bit better than Honor Magic6 Pro, having a global score of 79.5 against 76.6. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter device than the Honor Magic6 Pro. Honor Magic6 Pro features a better hardware performance than Galaxy S7, because it has 8 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a much better display than Honor Magic6 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Honor Magic6 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has better video frame rate, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture for better low light captures and video.
The Honor Magic6 Pro features a way better battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.