Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge has a global score of 78.1, which is slightly better than the Honor Magic6 Pro's score of 76.6. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Honor Magic6 Pro has Android 14, so it offers a couple nice extra features and increased performance. Galaxy S7 edge's body is somewhat thinner and much lighter than the Honor Magic6 Pro.
Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a faster CPU than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S7 edge counts with a slightly better display than Honor Magic6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a little better pixel density.
Honor Magic6 Pro takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a much more mega pixels back facing camera, higher video frame rates and a lot bigger sensor.
Honor Magic6 Pro has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory. Honor Magic6 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.