Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 has a score of 81.7, which is slightly better than the Honor Magic6 Pro's 76.6 score. The Galaxy S8 construction is somewhat thinner and much lighter than the Honor Magic6 Pro. Honor Magic6 Pro has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S8 has a little more vivid screen than Honor Magic6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Honor Magic6 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has a larger aperture to take better photography in low-light environments, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a much larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a lot higher resolution camera.
The Honor Magic6 Pro has a really longer battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.