Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-22 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.08 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 23.2 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is much better than Google Pixel, getting a score of 92.1 against 80.2. Although the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is extremely newer than the Google Pixel, it's a bit thicker and extremely heavier. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a quite better performance than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much sharper display than Google Pixel, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of screen, a much larger screen and a higher 1280 x 2800 resolution. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a back camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution, higher 60 fps video frame rates, a lot bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures and a much bigger aperture.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, because it has 1 TB internal storage. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.