Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-22 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black and White |
| Glass and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | P-OLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 23.2 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is better than Google Pixel 2 XL, with a score of 92.1 against 82.5. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design design is noticeably newer, but somewhat thicker and much heavier than Google Pixel 2 XL. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a quite inferior pixels amount per inch of display and a little worse resolution of 1280 x 2800px, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 1 TB internal memory capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM memory.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a much larger aperture, a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs, faster video frame rates and a way more MP camera.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 2 XL. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 2 XL, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.