Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-03-22 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Titan gray |
| Glass and Titanium | -- |
| $ 1389.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| 453 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a general score of 92.1, which is slightly better than the LG K92's 85.4 global score. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a noticeably newer phone than LG K92, but it's just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a newer 14 version and LG K92 has Android 10 version.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way better looking display than LG K92, because it has a little bit higher 1280 x 2800px resolution, a quite greater pixels count per inch in the screen and a bit larger screen. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has just a bit better processing power than LG K92, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM memory.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design shoots a bit better photographs and videos than LG K92, because although it has a lot lower resolution back-facing camera and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a lot larger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG K92, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a superior battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 40 percent more battery capacity.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG K92. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG K92, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.