Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-03-22 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Titanium | -- |
| $ 1389.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is way better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a score of 92.1 against 75.8. Even though the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force, it is incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones have Android operating system, but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has 14 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much sharper display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1280 x 2800px and a just a bit worse amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z Force, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a faster CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has 20 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video definition, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has better 60 fps video frame rate, a way better resolution camera in the back and a much bigger aperture.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a superior battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 60 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto Z Force, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.