Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-22 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass and Titanium | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, with a 92.1 score against 77.4. Although the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it is notably heavier and noticeably thicker. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much sharper display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bigger screen, a quite better display density and a higher resolution of 1280 x 2800px. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much better camera than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video quality, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos, a back camera with way more megapixels and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 960 GB more internal memory capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Moto Z2 Play, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.