Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-22 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 10.08 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a general score of 92.1, which is much better than Moto Z3 Play's global score of 76.3. Even though the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a lot newer than Moto Z3 Play, it is heavier and way thicker. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a more powerful CPU than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has 20 GB more RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much better screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a better 1280 x 2800 resolution, a quite greater count of pixels in each inch of display and a bit larger screen. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 1 TB internal storage.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same video quality, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a way bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a bigger aperture, higher video frame rates and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design costs a lot more money than Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.