Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-22 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Cyber shade |
| Glass and Titanium | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 23.2 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a general score of 92.1, which is way better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is just a little heavier than nubia Red Magic 3S, it's just a little bit thinner and much newer. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS, but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has the older 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a little bit larger display, a just a bit higher display density and a higher 1280 x 2800 pixels resolution. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 1 TB internal memory capacity.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a little bit better performance than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has 12 GB more RAM memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design shoots slightly better photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, better video frame rates, a higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a way larger camera sensor.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.