Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-03-22 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Ocean |
| Glass and Titanium | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | OLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 23.2 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an overall score of 92.1, which is better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 global score. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a more recent 14 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, giving some additional features. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a heavier cellphone than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but they have the same thickness.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a bit faster processor than OPPO Find X2 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM memory. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a more vivid screen than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a bit worse pixel density and a little lower resolution of 1280 x 2800, it also counts with a way brighter display and a little bit bigger display.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design takes slightly better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light images and a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 1 TB internal storage. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has improved battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.